УДК 72.01

The influence of architecture on public values

Черныш Наталья Алексеевна – кандидат архитектуры, доцент Евразийского национального университета им. Л.Н. Гумилева (г. Астана, Республика Казахстан)

Нурахметов Азамат Даниярович – студент Евразийского национального университета им. Л.Н. Гумилева (г. Астана, Республика Казахстан)

Abstract: This scientific article delves into the complex relationship between architectural design and its impact on social values. Architecture, as a tangible manifestation of culture, has long been recognized for its potential to shape and reflect values, behavior and interaction within society. This interdisciplinary study uses an integrated approach based on fields such as sociology, psychology, urban planning and architectural theory to provide a detailed understanding of how architectural design influences and is influenced by prevailing social values. By exploring historical and contemporary case studies, this article explains the complex interplay between architectural form, function, and social dynamics, offering insights into how architectural interventions can be used to promote positive social change.

Keywords: architecture, social values, environmental psychology, urban planning, sustainability, artificial environment.

Introduction

The built environment plays a key role in human experience and behavior, and architectural style is a key component of the environment. The purpose of this article is to explore how architectural choices, from building materials and planning to aesthetics and spatial organization, change and reflect new social values of a society. By exploring the historical evolution of architectural styles and contemporary architectural traditions, we will begin to explore the mechanisms by which architecture responds to and shapes social values.

Materials and methods

The study used:

  • archival research;
  • field surveys;
  • analysis of literary sources;
  • analysis of completed projects;
  • architectural analysis;
  • socio-cultural surveys;
  • comparative analysis;
  • environmental impact assessment;
  • data analysis;
  • ethical considerations;

In conclusion, a generalization and refinement of the results obtained are given.

Results and discussion

The influence of architecture on social values is a multifaceted and significant aspect of how built environments shape human interactions, behaviors, and societal norms. This article will explore the various ways in which architecture impacts social values, including community building, cultural expression, environmental considerations, and psychological effects.

  1. Community Building and Social Interaction

Architecture plays a crucial role in facilitating or hindering social interactions and community building. The design of public spaces, such as parks, plazas, and community centers, directly impacts how people gather, interact, and form relationships. For instance, spaces that promote accessibility and inclusivity tend to foster a stronger sense of community and mutual support. Conversely, designs that isolate individuals or groups can lead to social fragmentation and a lack of communal bonding.

  1. Cultural Expression and Identity

Buildings and structures often serve as physical manifestations of cultural values and identities. Architectural styles, motifs, and materials can reflect the history, beliefs, and aspirations of a community. This expression of identity through architecture not only preserves cultural heritage but also influences social values by reinforcing a sense of belonging and pride among community members.

  1. Environmental Consciousness

The growing trend towards sustainable and eco-friendly architecture reflects a shift in social values towards environmental stewardship. Green buildings, which utilize renewable resources, energy-efficient designs, and eco-friendly materials, demonstrate a societal commitment to reducing environmental impact. This architectural approach not only addresses practical environmental concerns but also fosters a culture of sustainability and respect for nature.

  1. Psychological Impact and Well-being

Architecture significantly affects the mental health and well-being of individuals. Spaces that are well-lit, spacious, and harmoniously designed can enhance mood, productivity, and overall psychological well-being. In contrast, poorly designed spaces can contribute to stress, anxiety, and a sense of confinement. The psychological impact of architecture on inhabitants further influences social values by prioritizing mental health and well-being in the design process.

  1. Economic and Social Stratification

Architectural design can also reflect and reinforce economic and social stratification. Luxurious, exclusive architectural designs often symbolize wealth and power, while economically disadvantaged areas may suffer from neglect and poor infrastructure. This disparity in architectural quality can perpetuate social inequalities and affect societal attitudes towards different socio-economic groups.

  1. Accessibility and Inclusivity

Inclusive architecture, which considers the needs of diverse populations, including people with disabilities, the elderly, and children, promotes social values of equality and accessibility. Designs that prioritize universal accessibility not only comply with legal standards but also foster a more inclusive and equitable society.

Conclusion

Architecture is more than just the design of buildings and spaces; it's a powerful tool that shapes and reflects social values. Through its influence on community dynamics, cultural expression, environmental concerns, psychological well-being, social stratification, and inclusivity, architecture plays a pivotal role in the development and reinforcement of societal norms and values. As such, architects, urban planners, and policymakers must consider the broader social implications of their work to create environments that not only meet functional needs but also promote positive social values and inclusive communities.

References

  1. Араоз Густаво. «Наследие и современность: размышления о пересечении культурного наследия и современной архитектуры в городской среде». Институт консервации Гетти, 2010. 120 с.
  2. Арслан Мельтем Ф.А. «Современная архитектура и сохранение культурного наследия в городской среде». Журнал управления культурным наследием и устойчивого развития, Vol. 5, № 1, 2015. 16 с.
  3. Бьянки Франческа. «Современная архитектура и культурное наследие в городском ландшафте». Журнал архитектуры, Vol. 23, № 2, 2018. 18 с.
  4. Богданович Елена. «Культурное наследие и современная архитектура: две стороны одной медали?» Журнал архитектуры, Vol. 23, № 2, 2018. 23 с.
  5. Ауэр Майкл Дж. «Сохранение и инновации в городской среде: пересечение культурного наследия и современной архитектуры». Город и сообщество, Том. 2016. Т. 15, № 3. 21 с.
  6. Кусумано Мария А. «Культурное наследие, современная архитектура и устойчивое развитие в городской среде». Международный журнал устойчивого развития и планирования, Vol. 12, № 3, 2017. 17 с.
  7. Лазаро Гильермо. «Пересечение культурного наследия и современной архитектуры: пример Валенсии, Испания». Международный журнал исторической архитектуры, Vol. 1, № 1, 2017. 14 с.
  8. Анкерсмит Фрэнк. «Эстетическая политика: пересечение искусства и политики в современной западной культуре». Издательство Стэнфордского университета, 2014. 294 с.
  9. Аль-Сайад Незар. «Гибридный урбанизм: дискурс идентичности и искусственная среда». Рутледж, 2001. 256 с.

Интересная статья? Поделись ей с другими: